What 25,891 prop-firm challenge purchases reveal about why traders fail, and pay again.
Source: anonymised purchase records from 13,478 traders, January 2025 to September 2026. No names, no accounts, only patterns.
of traders who buy a challenge buy another one. Not a different plan. The same challenge, at the same account size, on average 20 days later.
Those repeat buyers account for 64% of every challenge sold. The industry does not run on new traders. It runs on the same traders paying again.
| Challenges bought | Traders | Share |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9,419 | 70% |
| 2 | 1,917 | 14% |
| 3 | 792 | 6% |
| 4 to 7 | 937 | 7% |
| 8 or more | 413 | 3% |
The average buyer purchases 1.92 challenges. One in ten buys four or more. Four hundred and thirteen people bought eight or more, which at the entry tier is more money than a funded account would ever have paid them.
| Time between one purchase and the next | Share of rebuys |
|---|---|
| Within 7 days | 32% |
| Within 30 days | 64% |
| Within 90 days | 88% |
Median: 20 days. A challenge takes most of that to fail, so the pattern is: fail, wait a few days, buy again. There is no pause for review.
of repeat buyers bought the exact same challenge type every time. Same style, same rules, same result. The 18% who switched (from Regular to Knockout or Swing, or the reverse) are the only group whose behaviour changed at all.
The most common purchase is the entry-tier account at roughly $70 to $94 after discount. Ninety-five percent of orders used a discount code, which is why the entry tier feels cheap. It stops feeling cheap here:
| Traders with $500 or more in challenge fees | 1,274 |
| Top 10% of buyers have spent at least | $478 |
| Median cash paid per order, when cash was paid | $125 |
A trader who fails the entry tier three times has spent more than one attempt at a $50,000 account, whose payout on a pass is five times larger under the same rules. The checker shows this as "fee per $1,000 of first payout" for every firm and size.
Prop firms publish their pass rates in the 8 to 12% range for a two-phase evaluation. The purchase data cannot show which rule ended each challenge, but the rules themselves are public, and three of them explain most failures:
None of these are secrets. All of them are scattered across the firms' pages in different formats, and none come with the arithmetic done for your account size.
Open the Rule Trap Checker → It does all three in about two minutes.